|
Michigan Water Science Center |
Bacteria and Their Effects on Ground-Water Quality
Ground-water microbiology is a relatively new field of study.
Until the 1970's, scientific concepts and methods limited our knowledge of
groundwater microbiology. First, it was common to assume that the ground-
water environment was devoid of life. Second, methods for sampling ground-
water environments for microbes were very limited. Third, it was generally
assumed that water passing through the soil was purified by active microbial
processes and by filtration; therefore, there was little concern with ground-
water contamination. As ground-water contamination became more and more
evident during the 1980's, the motivation for understanding ground-water
environments increased. In addition, new methods in microbiology, based on
advances in molecular biology, provided microbiologists with new tools to
explore this difficult-to-sample microbial habitat.
Since 1990, several reviews of ground-water microbiology have been
published. Madsen and Ghiorse (1993) explored the suitability of ground-water
habitats for microbial growth, and compared ground-water environments to other
aquatic habitats (lakes, rivers, streams, wetalnds) where microbes are
abundant. Chapelle (1993) related microbial activities in ground water to
subsurface geochemistry. And Fyfe (1996) has recently proposed that the
term "biosphere" be extended to include deep subterranean habitats, based on
recent research demonstrating the presence of bacteria in deep subsurface
oil and gas deposits, and their role in mineral formation. Recent research,
summarized in these reviews, leads to several general statements that can be
made about ground-water microbiology:
- Most subsurface materials contain bacteria which can be cultured.
- Most of the bacterial types found in soils and surface waters have also
been found in shallow unconfined and confined aquifers.
- The ground-water environment is different from other aquatic
environments in that organic carbon is not replenished by photosynthetic
organisms, but must be supplied from the surface or from the aquifer materials
themselves.
- The ground-water environment is also different from other aquatic
environments in that bacteria are the dominant inhabitants, although
protozoa may also be common, and subterranean caves may harbor unique
invertebrate faunas.
- The majority of the numbers and types of microbes in ground-water
environments are found attached to the aquifer solids, and not free in the
ground water itself.
- Many ground-water quality parameters, such as pH, oxidation/reduction
(redox) status, dissolved oxygen, or the presence of specific mineral
constituents, may be influenced by microbial activity in the aquifer. This
is especially true when the aquifer is contaminated with substances that
bacteria can use for growth.
Over a century of research on naturally-occurring bacteria and their
activities allows us to interpret some of the roles of bacteria in ground-
water environments. We know that bacteria are found everywhere in our
environment. They are common in air, soil, water and in the habitats of our
daily lives. Bacteria are commonly present in soil at numbers of about
108-109 cells per gram. Bacterial slime (biofilms) on
rocks in streams and rivers may contain 109 bacteria per square
centimeter. Pristine lake waters contain many thousands of naturally-
occurring bacteria per liter. These naturally-occurring bacteria maintain the
fertility of soil, they transform minerals and nutrients in water and
sediments, and degrade leaf litter and other plant materials producing
materials useful to other organisms. In addition, naturally-occurring
bacteria carry out activities useful to humans by degrading wastes in our
landfills and compost piles, and cleansing water of the pollutants we add. We
purposefully use some bacteria to make food (cheese, beer, sauerkraut), we put
bacteria to work in sewage treatment plants, and we use them in
biotechnology to produce chemicals. Therefore, microbiologists have learned a
great deal about the types and activities of naturally-occurring bacteria.
Based on principles learned from other environments, we would expect
bacteria in ground water to be able to:
- transform organic carbon to carbon dioxide (CO2)
- use up oxygen when sufficient carbon is available for growth
- transform nitrogen between oxidized (e.g., nitrate - NO3) and
reduced (e.g., ammonium - NH4 or nitrogen gas - N2)
forms
- transform iron between oxidized [Fe(III)] and reduced [Fe(II)] forms
- transform sulfur between oxidized (e.g., sulfate - SO4) and
reduced (e.g., sulfide - H2S) forms
- produce methane
- degrade pesticides, fuels and other organic contaminants
- affect the distribution and solubility of some metals (e.g., arsenic,
uranium, etc.)
Indeed, there is evidence for each of these activities in ground water. The
review articles cited above are good resources for more information and case
examples. In addition, Norris et al. (1994) provides a general review of the
role of bacteria in natural and augmented bioremediation of fuels and solvents
in ground water.
Most of the activities of bacteria in ground water are the direct result of
the astounding metabolic versatility of bacteria. Although humans and other
vertebrate and invertebrate animals are primarily dependent on respiration
using oxygen, some bacteria may respire using NO3, SO4,
oxidized (ferric) iron [Fe(III)] or a variety of metals (such as arsenic
or uranium) as the oxidant. In addition, in the absence of oxygen,
bacteria may carry out processes such as methane production or
fermentation. Finally, bacteria may be capable of growth on some organic
compounds which are toxic to other organisms. The combination of these unique
metabolic capabilities suggests that bacteria play important roles in pristine
and contaminated ground water environments. Nevertheless, bacteria are
limited, as are all living things, by extremes of pH and temperature, by
lack of nutrients to support growth, and by toxicity of some compounds. In
addition, bacteria are subject to predation by larger microorganisms, such
as protozoa. Each of these environmental features must be assessed when
interpreting the role of bacteria in a particular ground water process.
Although there are some bacteria in all ground waters, and in general they
carry out beneficial processes, some bacteria or other microorganisms (e.g.,
protozoa, viruses) may cause disease in humans. Naturally some microorganisms
have learned to live on or in the human body. Many of these microorganisms do
no harm, and are even beneficial because they compete with other
microorganisms that might cause disease if they could become established in or
on our bodies. A few microorganisms (called pathogens) can cause disease in
humans. Some of these disease-causing microorganism are closely associated
with humans and other warm-blooded animals. These pathogens are transmitted
from one organism to another by direct contact, or by contamination of food
or water. Many of the pathogens which cause gastrointestinal disease are in
this category. Several human gastrointestinal pathogens produce toxins
which act on the small intestine, causing secretion of fluid which results
in diarrhea. Cells of the pathogen are shed in the feces, and if these
cells contaminate food or water which is then consumed by another person,
the disease spreads. Other pathogens are "opportunists" : they may not be
closely associated with humans or other mammals and they rarely cause
disease in healthy adults. Instead, these may be common bacteria or fungi
which exist in soil or water, but may cause disease in persons already
weakened by a pre-exisiting disease.
The fecal indicator bacteria (Escherichia coli, fecal coliforms,
fecal streptococci) are typically used to measure the sanitary quality of
water for recreational, industrial, agricultural and water supply purposes.
The fecal indicator bacteria are natural inhabitants of the gastrointestinal
tracts of humans and other warm-blooded animals. These bacteria in general
cause no harm. They are released into the environment with feces, and are
then exposed to a variety of environmental conditions that eventually cause
their death. In general, it is believed that the fecal indicator cannot
grow in natural environments, since they are adapted to live in the
gastrointestinal tract. Studies have shown that fecal indicator bacteria
survive from a few hours up to several days in surface water, but may
survive for days or months in lake sediments, where they may be protected from
sunlight and predators. In ground water, temperature, competition with
bacteria found naturally in the water, predation by protozoa and other small
organisms, and entrapment in pore spaces may all contribute to their
demise. We assume that pathogens similar to the fecal indicator bacteria
die at the same rate as fecal indicator bacteria. Therefore, if we find
relatively high numbers of fecal indicator bacteria in an environment, we
assume that there is an increased likelihood of pathogens being present as
well. Unfortunately, some pathogenic bacteria, viruses and protozoans may
have special survival mechanisms, such as cyst formation in
Cryptosporidium, or attachment of viruses to particles, so that
waters free of fecal indicator bacteria may still harbor these microorganisms.
This is even true of water which has undergone treatment for drinking water
purposes.
There is no clear way to associate risk of disease with the bacteriological
quality of ground water and measured by the presence of fecal indicator
bacteria. First, there is no direct association between the presence of
fecal indicator bacteria and the presence of specific pathogens. Second,
individuals are not equally susceptible to pathogens. Whether or not a
pathogen is successful in causing disease is related to the health of the
exposed individual and the state of his or her immune system, as well as to
the number of pathogen cells required to make the person ill. Some
pathogens can cause disease when only a few cells are present. In other
cases, many cells are required to make a person ill. Children, elderly
persons and persons with pre-existing illnesses are more susceptible to many
pathogens than are healthy young or middle-aged adults. Third, it would be
difficult to monitor for every possible pathogen. Each type of pathogen
requires a specific test and many of these tests are time-consuming or
expensive. Monitoring for each type of known pathogen would be
prohibitively expensive. Finally, new pathogens are still being
discovered. It was only about 5 years ago that a specific bacterium was
identified as a cause of stomach ulcers in humans. In addition, "old"
bacteria are acquiring new "tricks" in that they are becoming resistant to
antibiotics and are re-emerging as serious pathogens. The issue of emerging
infectious disease, and a call for the strengthening of our public health
knowledge base and infrastructure was made by the Centers for Disease
Control (CDC) in 1994.
Ground water has traditionally been considered to be the water source least
susceptible to contamination by indicator bacteria or human pathogens. This
is certainly true of ground water from deep, confined aquifers. Geldreich
(1990) reviewed the microbiological quality of source waters for drinking
water supply, the sources of contamination to ground water environments, and
the instances of waterborne disease outbreaks attributed to untreated or
poorly-treated ground water which contained pathogens. If fecal indicator
bacteria or pathogens commonly associated with humans are present in ground
water in measureable numbers, there is most likely a nearby connection with
a contaminated surface environment, such as a seepage from a waste lagoon or a
contaminated surface water, or a subsurface source of contamination such as
a septic tank, a broken or leaking sewer line, or an old or improperly
designed landfilll.
It is important to recognize that in spite of what we do know about bacteria
and other microorganisms, we still know relatively little about their types,
activities and habitats. For example, the ability of certain bacteria to grow
by carrying out the reduction of Fe(III), arsenic or uranium was first
demonstrated conclusively in the early 1990's. Likewise, the discovery of
new pathogens, the association of common bacteria or protozoa with specific
diseases, occurs on a relatively frequent basis. Bacteria, viruses and
protozoa are difficult to study, and most microbiologists believe that we have
identified fewer than 10% of the types of bacteria actually present in nature.
We also have only a very rudimentary understanding of what types of activities
bacteria carry out in nature, and the environmental factors which influence
their activities and survival. We have even less information on bacteria
in ground water, since this field of study is so recent. It is likely that
we will learn much more about the prevalence, activities, and significance
of microorganisms in ground water in the coming decade.
CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). 1994. Addressing emerging
infectious disease threats: a strategy for the United States. Atlanta, GA:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. This report can be obtained via
the World Wide Web at http://www.cdc.gov.
Chapelle, F.H. 1993. Ground-water microbiology and geochemistry. John Wiley
and Sons, New York.
Fyfe, W.S. 1996. The biosphere is going deep. Science 273:448.
Geldreich, E.E. 1990. Microbiological quality of source waters for water
supply. pp. 3-31 in G. A. McFeters (ed.) Drinking Water Microbiology:
Progress and Recent Developments. Springer-Verlag, New York.
Madsen, E. L. and W. C. Ghiorse. 1993. Groundwater microbiology: subsurface
ecosystem processes. pp. 167-214 in T.E. Ford (ed.) Aquatic
Microbiology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Boston.
Norris, R.D. et al. 1994. Handbook of Bioremediation. U.S. EPA Robert S.
Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory. Lewis Publishers, Ann Arbor.
USGS Contact:
Sheridan Haack- Project Coordinator
US Geological Survey
6520 Mercantile Way, Suite 5
Lansing, MI, 48911
Phone: 517-887-8909
E-Mail: SKHAACK@USGS.GOV
U.S. Department of the Interior,
U.S. Geological Survey
Water Resources Division,
Michigan District
Maintainer: Webmaster (gs-w-milns_webmaster@usgs.gov)
Last Modified: Wednesday, 04-Jan-2017 10:04:34 EST
Privacy Statement ||
Disclaimer ||
FOIA ||
Accessibility
URL Address: http://mi.water.usgs.gov/GWBactHOWeb.html